Aplica só nas próximas edições. As anteriores ficam preservadas na cor em que foram feitas.
Desenhar
Ações
Selecione texto para destacar • clique numa marca para remover
1. The background to escorting (9.1)
Source: HENSEN, Henk. Tug Use in Port: A Practical Guide. 4th ed. Rotterdam: STC Publishing, 2021. Chapter 9 — Escort tugs.
Edital: Anexo 2-B, Área II (Arte Naval / Shiphandling), item 9 (Hensen) → Chapter 9 — Escort tugs · Anexo 2-A, Área II, item 26 (Utilização de rebocadores portuários — emprego em modo de escolta) com itens 4 (Emprego de rebocadores na manobrabilidade) e 31 (Métodos de utilização de rebocadores empregados no Brasil).
Escorting by tugs is nothing new, and this chapter follows on from all the earlier ones rather than standing apart. Ports along rivers, canals or behind locks have long sent tugs to accompany large ships from the river entrance up to the berth. The service is also used for big tows such as offshore rigs, for ships with limited manoeuvrability after engine or rudder trouble, and in bad weather. Those older services, however, stay inside port areas and adjacent rivers. The escorting this chapter is really about is something narrower: the escorting of tankers and gas carriers in port approaches.
Specific attention to tanker escorting began in the USA around 1975, when the State of Washington mandated Foss Maritime to escort tankers over 40,000 dwt to limit oil spills in Puget Sound; laden tankers in Prince William Sound, Alaska, have been escorted since 1977.
The Exxon Valdez and OPA 90. On 24 March 1989 the Exxon Valdez ran aground outbound in the Valdez Arm, Alaska, causing a huge oil spill. The consequence was the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90) — about 15 years in the making — which empowered the US Coast Guard to set new tanker-escort regulations, specifically in Prince William Sound and Puget Sound.
Tanker, oil-tanker and gas-tanker escorting then spread, especially across Europe. In Norway it became mandatory in the Grenland area in 1979 after the gas tanker Humboldt incident, with a purpose-built tractor tug tethered to the ship from 1981; after the bulk carrier Mercantile Marcia sank in 1989 it was extended to tankers over 30,000 dwt at Mongstad and Sture. Sweden (Gothenburg, 1990), Finland (early 1990s) and Spain (La Coruña, after the Aegean Sea, 1992) followed; in the UK escorting is decided port by port and began on the Solent in 1991.
How much oil really comes from tanker accidents. A 1990 US Coast Guard study found tanker accidents caused only about 20 % of oil entering the sea — the rest from operational losses and municipal/industrial waste. And a small number of accidents account for most of the spillage; the majority of tanker accidents cause negligible pollution. The world's largest spill was the Atlantic Empress (1979, 270,000 t), ahead of the ABT Summer (1991, 260,000 t) and the Castillo de Bellver (1983, 250,000 t); the Exxon Valdez itself lost about 40,000 t.
Fig. 9.1 — Spills > 700 t by operation and primary cause, 1970–2017 (ITOPF; selected rows)
Primary cause
Underway, inland/restricted
Underway, open water
All operations (total)
Allision / collision
34
66
136
Grounding
46
68
150
Hull failure
0
49
60
Fire / explosion
1
25
53
All causes
81 (17 %)
230 (50 %)
462
Underway in inland and restricted waters — where escort tugs would operate — allisions/collisions and groundings together account for 17 % of the tanker accidents that caused spills over 700 t. Whether escort tugs could have prevented a given accident depends on its location, the nature of the failure, whether human error on board or ashore was involved, and the environmental conditions at the time.
2. Studies on escort requirements (9.2)
Whether escorting suits a particular port or approach has to be settled by a thorough study, not assumed. Such a study reviews the present situation, runs a risk assessment, checks whether escorting would actually reduce the risks of a passage, and then defines escort-tug requirements, escorting procedures and training.
2.1 Reviewing the present situation
The review weighs many factors together: the port and its approach (restrictions, bends, distances, depths, tides), the environmental conditions along the whole passage, the bottom and channel sides (rocky or sandy, steep or flat), anchorages, traffic separation schemes, aids to navigation, vessel traffic services, the shipping traffic itself (number, size, draft, speed, cargo), arrival/departure policy, pilotage, accident statistics, the environmental impact of an incident, and the tugs available. It may already lead to better procedures or services. Only when no further improvement is possible, or it is not enough, is a formal risk assessment carried out — establishing the probability and severity of an incident and the areas of concern.
2.2 Accident scenarios and response time
To find out whether escort tugs could reduce the risk, a set of accident scenarios is built for the areas of concern, covering engine and rudder failures and a powered ship steering a dangerous course. Each scenario must include the response time — the gap between a failure happening and the tugs becoming effective — based on realistic assumptions, because that time is critical to limiting how far a tanker advances and transfers after a failure.
The tools, and their limits. Fast-time simulation (par. 8.3.2.4) is well suited to testing many scenarios, tug types and configurations; performance-calculation programs and model tests help design a purpose-built tug. The study may recommend a particular configuration of existing tugs, define acceptable conditions and safe ship speeds, or call for a wholly new tug type. Requirements differ by port. Finally, suitability and procedures can be tested on a full-mission bridge simulator with experienced pilots, captains and tug masters.
Why full-scale verification still matters. Model tests, CFD and simulation can overestimate an escort tug's performance — which then hides a real risk for the tug, its crew and the escorted vessel. How far results differ from reality can only be checked by full-scale trials in comparable conditions, and this applies above all in waves and swell, where escort tugs often work. Dynamic towline forces from out-of-phase ship and tug motions, and the realistic behaviour of towline and winch, are extremely hard to simulate; the escorted ship also disturbs the wave pattern, which feeds back on the tug. Verification by full-scale trials and simulator research is needed for both the tug's capability and its effect on a disabled ship, in calm and in waves.
3. Developments in escorting (9.3)
3.1 Oil tankers
Escorting has long focused on tankers, to cut the risk of grounding and the oil spill that may follow. Much has changed: in 1992 MARPOL was amended to require double hulls on tankers of 5,000 dwt and more ordered after 6 July 1993, with single-hull tankers phased out by 2010. Partly because of this, tanker spills have fallen sharply even as oil and gas transport grew — 2019 and 2020 saw the lowest spill numbers in 50 years, with about 1,000 t lost in each, the lowest annual figures in five decades.
3.2 LNG carriers
LNG is escorted, but the spill risk is very low. More LNG carriers are being escorted as LNG transport grows, and escorting is compulsory in several approaches. Yet of over 400 LNG carriers (2016) none has had a significant spill. LNG carriers have multiple containment walls and insulation, with about 8 ft between hull and cargo; the double-walled, very thick tanks make them far more robust than oil or chemical tankers. Spilled LNG vaporises quickly, leaves no residue and does not harm aquatic life, and it burns only when vaporised and within narrow flammable limits if ignited — so the need for escorting on safety grounds is not high, though a port authority may decide otherwise.
Whether an LPG grounding spills more than an LNG one should be investigated separately: LPG (mainly propane and butane) is carried in various tank types. In April 2018 a collision on the Singapore Roads between the tanker Astro Saturn and the LPG carrier Crystal Sunrise leaked an estimated 1,796 t of butane, posing no danger to other shipping.
3.3 Blockage of the approach channel
There is also an economic reason to escort. If a navigational error or an engine/rudder failure leaves a large ship blocking the approach channel, clearing it can take hours or days — so ships are escorted to keep the channel open, as at Port Hedland and the ports of Dampier and Weipa (Australia) and for large container vessels bound for Southampton. Escorting bulk carriers raises the demands on deck fittings: about 35 % of Capesize vessels at Port Hedland have bitts and leads not usable by the port's tugs, so indirect towage can put over 120 t in the towline. Since 1 February 2021 the Pilbara Ports Authority therefore requires all Capesize vessels (≥ 120,000 dwt) to have a set of bitts and Panama lead/roller fairleads aft, near the centreline, rated to at least 120 t SWL.
4. Escorting objectives and tug placement (9.4)
The objectives of escorting are to ensure a safe passage through the approach channel — applying steering and braking forces to a disabled vessel and keeping it afloat, or at least limiting the impact of a collision or grounding — and to reduce the risk of pollution from groundings or collisions caused by technical or human failures on board a tanker.
Steering first, but be ready to push. What is needed depends entirely on the situation; after a failure it is mostly steering forces that keep a ship out of danger, and it may even be wrong to reduce speed after an engine failure, since speed gives the rudder and tugs something to work with. A lot of effort is needed to restore the heading or rate of turn of a large loaded tanker that takes a sheer, especially in small underkeel clearance. Escort tugs must also control the ship's position once speed drops — so they must be able to tow as well as push, which calls for good fendering and the right static bollard pull.
Two broad methods are used: escorting by a number of normal harbour tugs, and escorting by specifically designed escort tugs. In either case the tugs accompany the ship either with towline(s) secured or free-sailing at close quarters, ready to make fast if a failure occurs. Harbour-tug escorting is generally done inside port areas, over short distances and at low speed; purpose-built escort tugs work in port approaches, over longer distances and at higher speed.
5. Escorting by normal harbour tugs (9.5)
In some ports just one harbour tug, of any type, regularly escorts tankers; in others the number depends on ship size and the tugs available. The escort distance is usually only a few miles, sometimes longer through rivers and channels, at about five to six knots — though unsecured tugs, or longer distances, can push speeds up to nine knots. Escorting can be done with tugs at the ship's side (possibly including a rudder tug), with tugs towing on a line, or a mix; the choice depends on local practice and the tugs available.
5.1 Secured or not — the trade-off
Time versus coverage. Securing tugs takes several minutes, and there is no forewarning of when, where or what kind of failure will happen, nor of how the ship will then behave. So securing costs precious response time. But for tugs at the ship's side, being secured at one side only is a problem: if the ship veers the other way, they are on the wrong side, so secured tugs are needed on both sides — whereas unsecured tugs can be sent by the pilot to wherever they are needed. Forward tugs towing on a line, and after tugs with omni-directional propulsion, are more flexible, pulling to port or to starboard. Current and wind also weigh in the decision.
5.2 Effective and ineffective positions (Fig. 9.5)
In the example, a loaded tanker underway has an engine failure and veers to starboard, which the rudder cannot stop. As explained in section 4.3.5, the forward tug (no. 1) is not in a position to counter the sheer effectively — it may even make things worse — while the after tug (no. 2) and the rudder tug (no. 3) are much more effective. A rudder tug is as effective in steering as a side tug secured with lines, but with the advantage that it can apply force to port and starboard. Side tugs and forward tugs applying braking also create a turning moment, another reason tugs are needed on both sides; a rudder tug brakes without a high turning moment. Tugs at the side with a bow line can apply braking forces as well as steering forces.
Speed kills effectiveness — and pushing is dangerous. Above three to four knots, conventional tugs lose their steering effectiveness while their pushing forces grow, and pushing tends to increase the ship's speed, which should generally be avoided. Waves cut effectiveness further. Omni-directional tugs are more effective, including at higher speeds, and can steer without speeding the ship up. With a partly loaded tanker in a strong beam wind, after tugs trying to stop a sheer may push the ship, together with the wind, towards the danger — while a forward tug pushes the safer way.
5.3 Towing on a line, and escort speed
When tugs tow on a line (Fig. 9.5B), securing near the bow means ship's speed should not exceed about six knots. A stern tug with omni-directional propulsion, or a carrousel or combi-tug with an after towing point, can apply braking and steering forces both ways; a forward tug towing on a line, like a side tug, increases ship's speed when steering and is poor at opposing a sheer compared with a stern tug, though it does pull the ship away from danger. Towing on a line allows somewhat higher speeds than conventional side tugs — about four to five knots with a suitable conventional forward tug and an omni-directional after tug. A conventional tug used aft instead limits speed to a maximum of three to four knots, since it can brake and steer to both sides only at very low speed, and a conventional forward tug cannot brake at all.
Summary of harbour-tug escorting. It is much like ordinary port assistance, at similar speeds. Number, type and bollard pull must be chosen for the fairway, ship size, draft, freeboard, underkeel clearance and conditions, and whether to secure must be judged with care (securing may raise the number of tugs needed). An escorted speed of about five knots maximum lets tugs influence the ship effectively in a casualty. Rudder tugs and tugs on the quarter are best placed to oppose a sheer, and rudder tugs are most flexible (force to both sides). After tugs' steering forces point towards a danger area while forward tugs' point away. US regulations reflect the speed limit: a tanker must not exceed a speed beyond which the escort tugs can reasonably be expected to bring it safely under control within the fairway.
Training and escort planning matter for harbour-tug escorting too, though they depend on the local situation — they are discussed under purpose-built escorting (9.6.4).
6. Escorting by purpose-built tugs — methods (9.6.1)
Two methods are used: escorting by one escort tug (Fig. 9.9), the most common for years, and escorting by two escort tugs — dual escorting, also called team towing or tandem escort towing (Figs. 9.10–9.11). The tandem method, both tugs tethered, began in the Port of Long Beach, California, using modern VS or ASD/reverse-tractor tugs, so that relatively small escort tugs can handle heavy ships. Escort speeds with team towing are fairly low — about six knots, up to perhaps eight depending on tug design, crew training and sea conditions.
Why dual escorting helps with bulk carriers. The method has reached ports such as Port Hedland and Gladstone. It suits ships without strong securing points but that must be escorted — for example bulk carriers — because two tugs working in tandem divide the forces over two bollards and fairleads. But the ship's bollards and fairleads must still take the high steering and braking force in each tug's towline; this is crucial when ship speeds are high and the usual (larger) escort tugs are used rather than the smaller USA tandem tugs.
A dual-escort procedure. Asked to take the stern to port, the tug on the port side of the transom becomes the lead and goes into position first; the other holds back until the lead is settled, then moves up keeping its bow a metre or two aft of the lead tug's transom. The fairlead spacing on the ship's transom (about 20–30 m) usually gives the tugs a similar offset, provided their towlines start the same length. Both tugs keep their azimuth thrusters parallel, so a towline failure turns the tug quickly outboard away from the ship — trialled many times in the simulator without one tug ever hitting the other. If the transom is too narrow for transverse arrest, a better method is for both tugs to work in the indirect arrest mode four points abaft the beam, one out to starboard and one to port, slowing the ship while still steering it.
7. The indirect mode and the geometry of forces (9.6.2)
An escort tug is, properly, a tug designed to escort ships over long distances at relatively high speeds; all are of the omni-directional type, ASD/reverse-tractor or tractor (most escort tractor tugs use VS propulsion). They are secured (tethered) to the ship's stern or kept unsecured (untethered) but ready. Tethered to the stern, they can apply high steering and/or braking forces if a failure occurs, and at high speed the steering force is generated in the so-called indirect method.
7.1 Direct, indirect and powered-indirect (Fig. 9.8)
Figure 9.8 shows the direct and indirect towing methods, with the terms once used by propulsion maker Aquamaster: the indirect arrest mode is recommended to initiate a turn, and the combination arrest mode to oppose a turn at low and higher speeds. In direct mode the achievable steering force falls as speed rises; above the normal harbour speed of about 5–6 knots, higher steering forces come from the indirect mode (Fig. 9.12).
The powered indirect manoeuvre (3–7 knots). The tug drives itself out further than the basic indirect position, towards a point where the towline is at about 90° to the ship's centreline; full power is then applied with the tug at up to perhaps 70° to the incoming water flow, depending on ship's speed. As speed drops the tug's drift angle (a, Fig. 9.13) can increase, because the sideways resistance falls, letting more engine power build towline force. This angle (a) can be compared to a normal ship's rudder, whose maximum is about 30–35°.
High steering forces result — higher than in direct mode. In the 5–7 knot range, US measurements show line pulls of 75–125 % of the tug's bollard pull: a 4,400 hp tug of about 52 t bollard pull reached roughly 62 t steering force at 5 knots (≈ 120 %), falling to about 75 % at 7 knots. Crucially, the powered indirect mode delivers steering force much faster than the direct (dynamic arrest) mode, in which the whole tug body must be dragged across the flow — slow, especially at 5–7 knots. Escort speeds, though, can reach 10 or even 12 knots, which is why the indirect mode is developed here.
7.2 Centre of pressure and towing point (Figs. 9.13–9.14)
For tug performance, the size and especially the points of application of the transverse forces matter most. Fig. 9.13 shows a tractor tug in indirect mode: the propeller thrust holds the transverse and longitudinal forces — from the hydrodynamic force on hull and skeg and from the towline — in balance. The two locations that govern performance are the centre of pressure (COP) and the towing point (T), described by four levers:
Lever x vs lever y (horizontal). The larger x is compared with y, the less sideways thrust is needed to balance the hydrodynamic force at the COP — so the higher the towline force. Good design pushes the COP as far forward as possible.
Lever a (vertical, T above COP). The larger the vertical distance between towing point and COP, the larger the list (heel) for a given towline force.
Lever b (vertical, T above propulsion point P). The larger the vertical distance between propulsion point and towing point, the more the sideways thrust reduces the list.
ASD versus VS. Since escort tugs are designed so the sideways thrust needed at the COP is small, the height of the towing point above the COP is what matters most for heeling. With equal towline forces and the same stability, the ASD-tug shown lists more than the VS tug, because its towing point sits higher above the COP and its towing point is closer to the propulsion point (less leverage to oppose heel). The x:y ratio is about the same for both — but the COP moves towards the towing point as the drift angle gets smaller, and its exact position at each inflow angle can only be found by model tests, depending on hull form, skeg and propulsion units. For a VS tug the towing point and COP are largely fixed by the skeg; a good ASD/reverse-tractor result comes from a towing point that is not too high and slightly aft of the figure, plus a hull shape that puts the COP as far forward as possible.
Underwater form and skegs. Beyond those levers, the form and lateral area of the tug's underwater body drive the towline force achievable in indirect mode. So VS escort tugs get specific high-lift skegs, and many ASD escort tugs carry a skeg far forward under the hull or a box keel. Reducing the lateral area cuts performance — as when bunkers run nearly empty — yet a minimum of ballast and fuel can also help: it lowers the hazard of early deck immersion and makes the tug more responsive. In general VS tractor tugs seem to give somewhat higher steering forces in indirect mode, while ASD-tugs give somewhat higher braking forces, though this varies with speed and local need.
Note 1 — a feature good for indirect can hurt direct. Design features aimed at indirect-mode performance can be negative for the direct mode: a large skeg under an ASD-tug increases underwater lateral resistance, making it even harder to apply steering forces quickly and effectively in direct mode. Ship's speeds during assistance and the most important operating modes must therefore both be considered when shaping the tug's underwater body.
8. Braking and steering forces, speed and stability (9.6.2)
Escort tugs must deliver steering and/or braking forces in an emergency. Steering forces are considered the more important — as long as there is room ahead and the bends are not too sharp, a ship can be steered clear of danger. But whether steering will be enough depends on many factors; environmental conditions may drift a ship into danger as soon as its speed falls after an engine failure, whatever steering is given. When the area or distance ahead is very restricted, braking is needed, and the most effective way to take way off — given room — is to initiate a turn, which slows a tanker or gas carrier quickly and cuts head reach.
Fig. 9.16 — Steering pull required at 10 knots (based on 15° rudder angle; Hesnes Neptun)
Escorted ship
Required steering pull (tons)
40,000 dwt bulk carrier
40
70,000 dwt bulk carrier
60
150,000 dwt tanker
88
300,000 dwt VLCC
116
30,000 m³ gas carrier
32
60,000 m³ gas carrier
43
Turning to slow down, and the rudder-jam case. After a failure a large loaded tanker may already have a rate of turn that is hard to stop; if circumstances allow it is usually better to help the tanker turn, perhaps 180° or 360°, especially at higher escort speed — though turning at speed loads the tug heavily and can be unsafe, since the tug on the outside of the turn speeds up well above the ship. As speed drops the tug must switch from indirect to direct (combination arrest) mode to stay effective. The steering forces in Fig. 9.16 should meet the ship's rudder force with the propeller turning at matching speed; for a bend at 10 knots a 15° rudder angle is about a practical maximum. If a rudder jams, higher forces may be needed — but stopping the propeller (or zero pitch on a CPP) cuts the rudder's lift: DNV takes the lift without the propeller turning as 0.53 times the lift with it turning, which improves the tug's chances.
Fig. 9.17 — Rudder forces (tons) for loaded tankers, by speed and rudder angle (propeller turning; selected)
Speed
100,000 dwt @ 15°
200,000 dwt @ 15°
300,000 dwt @ 25°
6 knots
30
50
80
8 knots
55
85
140
10 knots
85
130
220
12 knots
120
190
320
Rudder forces are largest at about a 25° rudder angle, typical of most tankers' rudders. Required steering and stopping forces rise as underkeel clearance falls (Chapter 6), and after a failure beamy full-bodied ships develop the fastest rates of turn — so insight into the ship's behaviour is part of setting escort requirements. The maximum forces a local escort tug should apply must come from a study of representative failure scenarios for the ships and area, validated by practical tests; a tethered tug reacts faster and so needs relatively lower steering forces than a passive (untethered) one, which suffers a much larger time delay.
The one-minute delay — the Arco Juneau trial (1997). A fully loaded 125,000 dwt tanker at 8 knots had the large VS escort tug Lindsey Foss tethered to its stern. The rudder was put hard-a-starboard; 30 s later the "failure" was recognised and the engine stopped; after another 30 s — a total delay of one minute — the tug was ordered to stop the turn in indirect mode. By the time the ship was back on course it was more than 500 m off track, twice. The lesson: a tethered tug, a short recognition time and the tug master's experience are decisive — and even a large purpose-built tug with a not-too-large tanker can be left far off track, increasingly so at higher speed.
Maximum forces also depend on sea conditions. The SAFETUG project (Chapter 4), testing an ASD and a Voith tug, found the tug's own escort towing capability in waves (up to 2.5 m at 6 s period, up to 4 m at 10 s) was in most cases close to its calm-water value — but it was the transit towards the ship that produced the highest, critical transverse accelerations at the tug master's position, and all assist work in waves demands operation-specific tug-master training. The largest purpose-built escort tugs seem limited to about a 4 m wave height, and even then need a towing winch with a load-reducing system.
8.1 Required free-sailing speed
Maximum escort speed is usually around 10 knots but can be up to 12, so the tug's free-sailing speed must be higher — present escort tugs reach 12.5 to 15 knots. An escort tug needs this over-speed to overtake the escorted ship in time, to overcome the ship's propeller slipstream when approaching the stern to pass or connect the towline, to keep reserve power for strong interaction effects at high speed, and because in bad weather a tug's speed may fall faster than a large ship's, and any deviation from a straight course cuts the tug's speed in line with the ship.
8.2 Stability — heeling is the limit
Stability is critical. Towline forces can reach one-and-a-half to two times the bollard pull at 10 knots in indirect mode, and waves and manoeuvres add more — so the towing point is kept as low as possible to cut heeling moment, and hull-side sponsons are sometimes added for reserve buoyancy and larger righting moments. Low-stretch towlines (common on escort tugs) raise the forces; longer ones absorb dynamic loads a little better. A minimum metacentric height of about 3 m is recommended, but excessive GM is also avoided — in bad weather it causes harsh accelerations that harm the tug and make work on board almost impossible. IMO and class society rules give escort-tug stability requirements (Appendix 3), including icing allowances for ships operating where ice accretion is likely.
The heeling-angle placard (Fig. 9.19). A golden rule from an experienced escort training master is "do not immerse the deck line" — if deck immersion is the limit, little safety margin is left. A placard in the wheelhouse shows the permissible heeling angle and steady towline force for each loading condition and escort speed, in coloured zones: green (safe), amber (caution — the master must act to reduce the angle) and red (immediate action). A precise electric inclinometer with programmable zones and alarms is strongly recommended over the basic ship's inclinometer. Robert Allan's RAL-Sim simulations showed that swinging from maximum steering force to starboard across to maximum to port is a high-risk manoeuvre, because of the high heeling forces when the tug's inertia is taken up in the towline too suddenly — worse on the winch brake, and worse still if thrust is lost. Both the heeling information and the high-risk manoeuvres deserve attention in escort training.
9. Design, towlines, fail-safe, communication and planning (9.6.2)
9.1 Design developments and the additional towing point
An escort tug must be seaworthy and use its best capabilities. ASD-tugs run bow first, free-sailing or tethered — the fastest and safest direction for the deck crew, especially in high waves and in indirect mode. Tractor tugs run bow first when free, but tethered they run stern first, with the lower after deck leading and a lower maximum speed; at speed and in waves, water comes over the after deck easily. So some VS escort tugs (the Bess and Boss, Fig. 9.20; also the Ajax) were redesigned with higher sheer and bulwarks at the skeg end, a more pointed hull, and the wheelhouse turned 180° for a good view in the operating direction. Skeg developments continue for both VS and ASD tugs: modern VS-tugs use high-lift (hydrofoil-shaped) skegs, and the Voith Turbo Fin (VTF), with a rotating tube at the skeg end, is claimed to add about 18 % steering force.
An extra towing point aft (Fig. 9.23). Astern of a ship with a towline fastened, a tractor tug may sheer from side to side because the towing point sits centred above the skeg. To steady it, many VS (and some azimuth tractor) escort tugs carry a second towing point at the after end — a fairlead, hook or towing pins through which the towline leads when running in line. If a failure happens and the tug must steer, it must be able to take the towline out of this far-aft point (it can be opened hydraulically) or its achievable steering force is lower. ASD-tugs usually have a far-forward towing point, but the Dux, Pax and Audax carry towing pins both forward and aft. Tests with radio-controlled models showed the secondary point also adds safety in extreme conditions — the after deck submerges less easily, and the tug's motions are less severe.
9.2 Deck equipment and towlines
Towline strength. An escort towline's minimum breaking strength should be at least two to three times the maximum achievable braking and steering force, allowing for peak loads with present OCIMF safety factors of 2.0 for synthetic lines (including HMPE). Class rules differ: DNV GL requires the towline to be at least twice the bollard pull when bollard pull exceeds 100 t (1,000 kN), the factor rising at lower bollard pull (e.g. 2.1× at 80 t). Bureau Veritas requires twice the maximum towline force during escorting, or at least the winch brake-holding power, for forces over 100 t. (Note 2: DNV GL bases the design force on the bollard pull, giving little margin since maximum towline force can be almost twice the bollard pull — so an operator may choose a higher strength.)
Towlines are generally HMPE fibre (Spectra/Dyneema) with pennants of the same material, sometimes nylon stretchers; lengths are usually 100–150 m, sometimes 60–80 m at the tug master's discretion. HMPE lines are light and easy to handle — important when the ship's crew may have to lift the line aboard by hand with no power — and they float, so they do not easily foul propellers; but their stretch is very low, so short lines easily give high peak loads. A pennant, often of the same or larger breaking strength, is cow-hitched or spliced eye-to-eye and extends the main towline's life (wear is largest where the line is taken aboard the ship). All towing equipment must be highly reliable and sized for the highest expected loads, and escort winches should have high brake-holding power, fast deployment and retrieval, a high pull and a load-reducing system to avoid excessive towline loads, especially in waves. Some class societies set detailed escort-winch requirements (e.g. BV: the brake must act directly on the drum and work if primary power fails; winches for wave areas need an active pay-out / haul-in system reacting at 110 % of rated towline force; escort in such areas may not rely on the drum brake).
Emergency / escort deck-fitting SWL on the escorted ship (par. 7.8)
Tanker size
Chock (fairlead) arrangement
Strong-point arrangement
Over 20,000 but under 50,000 dwt
min. 100 t SWL
min. 100 t SWL (single-eye line/grommet)
50,000 dwt and above
min. 200 t SWL
min. 200 t SWL (single-eye line/grommet)
Deck equipment on the escorted ship must suit the high towline loads and the type of towline; complaints about a lack of suitable strong points and fairleads are common. Where they are too weak, escort speed may have to be reduced, or dual escorting used (smaller tugs or limited towline force), or — for tankers not meeting OCIMF recommendations — a second tug kept standing by. OCIMF recommends using the SOLAS emergency towing arrangement for escort/pull-back too, without impeding the towing arrangement.
9.3 Connecting, fail-safe and communication
Passing and releasing the line. An untethered escort tug must make fast quickly to deliver force in time — generally done at fairly high ship's speed, coming close to the stern to pass the line (easier for stern-drive than tractor tugs, whose skeg feels the propeller wash). Sea and swell make it harder or impossible; if the line slips into the water it may foul the tug's propellers and make it useless, so a line-throwing gun can pass a heaving and messenger line. Letting go while underway is done at fairly high speed but always safely: the tug steams up through the ship's wash until almost touching the stern, signals, and the crew lowers the line gently so it does not fall into the water and foul the propeller.
Operating reliability, fail-safe and communication. Escort tugs often work as a single unit over large distances, so reliability must be high; if propulsion is lost while steering, the towing point must let hydrodynamic forces turn the tug safely (for azimuth tractor tugs in transverse arrest at high speed, a far-aft towing point avoids capsize if one unit fails). Good radio communication between pilot and tug master is indispensable, the more so when a tethered tug astern is out of the pilot's sight and a passage takes hours; clear, unambiguous tug commands and uniform basic commands between escort ports are wanted (work by Captain Schisler of Long Beach). Essential securing information must be exchanged between pilot, captain and tug master before the voyage.
Active vs passive, and versatility. Escorting may be untethered (passive) or tethered (active); the choice depends on fairway constraints, ship dimensions and draft, environmental conditions and the time to secure — and on visibility (some ports set a 1-mile lower limit). In restricted channels, only a tethered escort can avoid a grounding or collision; an actively escorting tug just following in line must not interfere with pilot manoeuvres. In passive mode the tug keeps pace close abeam, slightly forward or aft (a good spot is about four points on the bow, ~2 cables off), acts as an extra lookout, and can be secured fast if a failure occurs — and meanwhile can push at a shoulder or pass a line at the bow. US federal rules in Puget Sound and Prince William Sound require at least two tugs, even with purpose-built escort tugs, to improve the chance of useful assistance.
Escort planning and standardisation. Escorting must be planned with the pilot, tug master(s) and, if possible, the captain: ship particulars, route and passage times, planned speeds and emergency anchorages, traffic and hazards, environmental conditions, escort method and tug positions, the maximum towline force the tug can make at the escort speed, the SWL of the ship's fittings, the rendezvous position, communications, and towing-equipment requirements. In compulsory US escort areas a pre-escort conference is mandatory. For comparing tugs, optional class notations exist: DNV GL expresses performance as (FS, t, v) — the maximum transverse steering pull FS at 8 and/or 10 knots and the time t to shift from a 30° indirect position on one side to the mirror position; Bureau Veritas uses (Txmax, Vmax, Tymax) — maximum braking force, applicable speed and maximum steering force. The US ASTM "Standard Guide for Escort Vessel Evaluation and Selection" (2015, Appendix 4) describes the whole process of building a ship- or waterway-specific escort plan.
10. Escort tugs in use, training and a summary of requirements (9.6.3–9.6.5)
10.1 Escort tugs in use
The tugs used are ASD/reverse-tractor and VS tugs, with bollard pull between roughly 40 and 140 t. A sharp definition is hard: an escort tug is properly one built specifically to escort ships — tankers and gas carriers — at relatively high speed, but harbour tugs with escort capabilities are often used for escorting too, so the two cannot be cleanly separated. Even so, purpose-built escort tugs keep being built — the new tugs for Norway and for Prince William Sound, the icebreaking Ocean Tundra (Fig. 9.27) and the icebreaking Yuribey for the Russian Arctic port of Sabetta.
10.2 Training and pilotage
"Practice makes perfect." Expensive escort tugs are deployed as a safeguard, sometimes over large distances, and with escort speeds of 10 knots or more the human element becomes decisive. Training — practical on-the-job plus theory — should cover escort procedures and communications, escort speeds, the ship's likely behaviour after a failure, the tugs' capabilities and limitations and the various assist manoeuvres, and towing equipment and line handling. Ice escorting differs greatly from open-water escorting and needs specific training: in heavy ice active escorting may not apply (a disabled ship stops by itself), while in lighter ice high forces come from combining icebreaking resistance with direct or indirect towing, and the master must read ice, judge nozzle-blocking, and control towline tension on the winch.
Pilots, tug masters and keeping experience alive. Pilots are an essential link; in busy ports a "choice pilot" system limits escort work to a few pilots so their experience builds faster, and a second pilot may be required for very sensitive areas or large ships. The tug master and crew are the other link — in a failure, much depends on how fast the master can place the tug to apply the forces needed. Because a failure may never actually happen, pilots and tug masters can lose alertness, so DNV recommends regular refresher courses on a full-mission simulator (with captains if possible) and real-life exercises with a tanker and escort tug. DNV found from full-scale tests that the key observation was that "practice makes perfect": tugs should be purpose-built and crews amply trained, and a well-designed, well-manned escort tug reduces the risk picture significantly while a poorly equipped or manned one increases it dramatically.
10.3 Summary of escort-tug requirements (9.6.5)
Hensen lists what a good escort tug needs:
Optimal manoeuvrability and high free-sailing speed; high working reliability.
Good sea-keeping both free-sailing and in the escort operating direction; sufficiently high freeboard; good static and dynamic stability.
A safe working deck for handling towlines in rough seas at high speed.
Ability to apply high steering and/or braking forces over the whole escort speed range, and to assist in different ways.
Bollard pull enough to keep the escorted ship under control once speed has reduced to zero, allowing for wind and current.
A safe, effective towing-point location for heeling angle, achievable towline force and engine-failure behaviour; an extra towing point if needed.
Deck equipment that easily withstands the high towline forces; towlines with a high safety factor, light and strong synthetic fibres with positive buoyancy, passable by hand if the ship has no power at its stations.
Good fendering, preferably all round; a reliable radio system; a well-equipped wheelhouse with all-round visibility, towline-tension control and displays, emergency abort, and window heating.
Weather-deck openings giving access below fitted with watertight doors, kept closed during escort operations.
Fire-fighting and pollution-control duties, and operations in cold climates, add their own specific requirements (as with Dux, Pax and Audax).
11. Escort regulations and concluding remarks (9.7–9.8)
11.1 United States — OPA 90 and 33 CFR 168
US federal, state and local regulations apply in several compulsory escort areas, federal rules overriding the rest; "escort vessel" can mean any suitably fendered and outfitted tug. OPA 90 requires the Secretary of Transportation to define areas where single-hull tankers over 5,000 gross tonnage must have two escort vessels — Prince William Sound and Puget Sound — with rule-making delegated to the US Coast Guard (33 CFR 168, "Escort Requirements for Certain Tankers"). The 2010 Coast Guard Authorization Act extended this to double-hull tankers over 5,000 t in those waters, also requiring at least two towing vessels.
Federal performance requirements (33 CFR 168) — escort vessels, acting singly or jointly, must:
Capability
Requirement
Tow
Tow the tanker at 4 knots in calm conditions, and hold it steady against a 45-knot headwind
Hold course
Hold the tanker on a steady course against a 35° locked rudder at 6 knots
Turn
Turn the tanker through 90° (free-swinging rudder, 6 knots) within the same advance and transfer it could turn itself with hard-over rudder
Prince William Sound (VERP) and other US ports. The industry's Vessel Escort and Response Plan (VERP) guides tanker safety in Prince William Sound; from July 2018 Edison Chouest Offshore built nine new tugs there — five ASD 4517 escort tugs (LOA 42.7 m, BP 136 t, max towline pull 197 t) and four ASD 3212 general-purpose tugs (LOA 31 m, BP 66 t, 126 t), the VERP fleet ranging about 65–135 t bollard pull, with roles named Primary/Secondary/Sentinel/Hinchinbrook/Ice-Scout/Response. Loaded tankers need a minimum of two close escorts within ¼ nm, must not exceed a controllable speed (6 knots in Valdez Narrows up to 12 in Central Sound), and transit is prohibited above 40 knots wind in the Narrows. Puget Sound requires two tugs for tankers over 40,000 dwt (less tethering for fully redundant tankers with twin independent propulsion/steering), max 10 knots in Rosario; California requires escort for tankers carrying ≥ 5,000 t of oil, with speed limits of 8 knots (under 60,000 t displacement) and 6 knots (above), exempting double-hull tankers with fully redundant steering and propulsion.
11.2 Europe and the Turkish Straits
In Europe escort rules are state or local terminal regulations agreed between port authority, pilots and tug owners, with no fixed bollard-pull rule; most ports use one purpose-built tug, but two if the ship does not meet OCIMF fittings recommendations. In Norway, the Sture Terminal compels escort for all crude tankers and LPG vessels over 20,000 grt (one tug to 180,000 dwt, two above); Mongstad for oil tankers over 20,000 grt (two above 320,000 dwt); and dedicated stretches (Fugløya–Porsgrunn, Melkøya). In the UK, Southampton escorts inbound/outbound oil tankers over 60,000 dwt (Esso Fawley) and certain large container ships, and Sullom Voe requires two tugs — one secured at the stern in drag mode — with tankers at a moderate speed not over 8 knots. In the Turkish Straits escorting is not compulsory but strongly recommended: LNG carriers by tugs of at least 60 t each totalling 150 t bollard pull, LPG carriers over 200 m LOA by tugs of at least 90 t.
Can the escort tug always prevent a grounding? (Fig. 9.30) Not necessarily. Situation 1: a half-loaded tanker with engine and rudder failure is steered to port by the escort tug; as speed drops the ship drifts faster, the drift angle must grow, and steering force plus wind force both act to starboard — so the ship most probably drifts onto the shoals unless a forward tug is secured in time. Situation 2: just before a bend an engine/rudder failure occurs; the tug steers the ship into the turn, but the current pushes it to port and counteracts the turn, and with falling speed the ship most probably drifts onto the shoals — worse in small underkeel clearance, where the current's influence is much larger.
11.3 Concluding remarks (9.8)
The bottom line. Escorting now covers not only tankers and gas carriers but bulk carriers and even large container vessels, while the need to escort tankers and gas carriers has decreased; a clear aim is to keep fairways from being blocked (Port Hedland, Southampton). According to a 1993 Shell study, human error is the immediate cause of at least 80 % of shipping casualties — so training captains, mates and pilots, and using full-mission simulators more, can prevent much of it. Pollution cases should be investigated for cause, and where technical failures recur, tanker design should change. Good designs already point the way: the 140,000 dwt double-hull Endeavour-class tankers with two independent engine rooms, twin propellers, twin rudders and a 3,000 hp bow thruster, and the 315,000 dwt Stena V-Max VLCC with two separate engine rooms and double rudders and propellers. Escort tugs compensate for technical and human failures, but escorting cannot avoid every accident — especially with a single purpose-built tug — and full-scale trials in deep water give too optimistic a view, since in the small underkeel clearance of port approaches the currents bite harder, the rudder works less, and far more tug effort is needed.